Uploaded and Shared in Youtube by: NEJMvideo In the international SYNTAX trial, 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to either revascularization with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention involving drug-eluting stents. The need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower with CABG, but the risk of stroke was significantly higher — a tradeoff that must be considered in making clinical decisions regarding patients with advanced coronary disease. In a roundtable discussion moderated by Dr. Thomas Lee, cardiologists David Hillis and Elizabeth Nabel debate the implications of these findings for clinical practice.
WHAT IS SYMPOSIER?
Symposier.com is the technological platform that will allow you (and your colleagues) to share medical information, event calendars, clinical cases, new procedures and much more with medicine professionals around the world.
Get in touch with medical professionals around the world and seize the collective experiences and knowledge to the benefit of your own patients.
Establish common-interest groups to build a collaboration network
Learn, comment and publish about local or international medical events
Seize and publish to our video, image and medical documents library
Symposier uploaded this video.
NEJM Roundtable: CABG vs. Stenting: Clinical Implications of the SYNTAX Trial, Part II
Date: 06 Dec 2009
Uploader: Symposier
Lenght: 4m 58s
Specialty:
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Surgery
